INHALT

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 443/2011 of 5 May 2011 extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America to imports of biodiesel consigned from Canada, whether declared as originating in Canada or not, and extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 to imports of biodiesel in a blend containing by weight 20 % or less of biodiesel originating in the United States of America, and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Singapore

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 443/2011
of 5 May 2011
extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America to imports of biodiesel consigned from Canada, whether declared as originating in Canada or not, and extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 to imports of biodiesel in a blend containing by weight 20 % or less of biodiesel originating in the United States of America, and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Singapore
1.
PROCEDURE
1.1.
Existing measures
1.2.
Request
1.3.
Initiation
1.4.
Investigation
1.5.
Investigation period
2.
PRODUCT FORMING THE OBJECT OF THE CIRCUMVENTION INVESTIGATION
3.
IMPORTS OF BIODIESEL INTO THE UNION VS. EXPORTS FROM THE USA
4.
CANADA
4.1.
General considerations
4.2.
Change in patterns of trade
4.2.1.
Imports into the Union
4.2.2.
US exports of biodiesel to Canada
4.2.3.
Production in Canada and sales of genuine Canadian biodiesel to the Union
4.3.
Conclusion on the change in the pattern of trade
4.4.
Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the countervailing duty
4.5.
Undermining the remedial effect of the countervailing duty
4.6.
Evidence of subsidisation
4.7.
Conclusion
5.
SINGAPORE
6.
USA
6.1.
Preliminary remarks
6.2.
Exports of B20 and below from the USA to the Union
6.3.
Change in patterns of trade
6.4.
Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the countervailing duty
6.5.
Undermining the remedial effect of the countervailing duty
6.6.
Evidence of subsidisation
6.7.
Conclusion
7.
MEASURES
7.1.
Canada
7.2.
USA
8.
TERMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION AGAINST SINGAPORE
9.
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION
10.
DISCLOSURE
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Article 5
Article 6
ANNEX