Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/301 of 24 February 2022 extending th... (32022R0301)
INHALT
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/301 of 24 February 2022 extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/776 on imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics (‘GFF’) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’) to imports of GFF consigned from Morocco, whether declared as originating in Morocco or not, and terminating the investigation concerning possible circumvention of the countervailing measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/776 on imports of GFF originating in Egypt by imports of GFF consigned from Morocco, whether declared as originating in Morocco or not
- COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/301
- of 24 February 2022
- extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/776 on imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics (‘GFF’) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’) to imports of GFF consigned from Morocco, whether declared as originating in Morocco or not, and terminating the investigation concerning possible circumvention of the countervailing measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/776 on imports of GFF originating in Egypt by imports of GFF consigned from Morocco, whether declared as originating in Morocco or not
- 1.
- PROCEDURE
- 1.1.
- Existing measures
- 1.2.
- Request
- 1.3.
- Product concerned and product under investigation
- 1.4.
- Initiation
- 1.5.
- Comments on initiation
- 1.6.
- Investigation period and reporting period
- 1.7.
- Investigation
- 2.
- RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION
- 2.1.
- General considerations
- 2.2.
- Level of cooperation
- 2.3.
- Change in the pattern of trade
- 2.3.1.
- Imports of GFF
- 2.3.2.
- Export volumes of glass fibre rovings from China and Egypt to Morocco
- 2.3.3.
- Conclusion on the change in the pattern of trade
- 2.4.
- Nature of circumvention practices for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the countervailing duty
- 2.5.
- Start or substantial increase of operations
- 2.6.
- Value of parts and added value
- 2.7.
- Undermining of the remedial effect of the duty
- 2.8.
- Evidence of subsidisation
- 3.
- MEASURES
- 4.
- REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION
- 5.
- DISCLOSURE
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 4
- Article 5
- Article 6
Feedback